The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
DHI · Industrials · Narrow moat
Wonderful & reasonably priced
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
MATX · Industrials · Narrow moat
Wonderful & reasonably priced
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | HBB | EPAC | DHI | MATX |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 67 (highest) | 67 (highest) | 67 (highest) | 67 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 58 | 83 (highest) | 56 | 32 |
| Pricing power | 34 | 69 (highest) | 33 | — |
| Returns on capital | 100 (highest) | 38 | — | 40 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 99 | 100 (highest) | 78 | 95 |
| Capital allocation | 42 | 44 | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) |
| No price data | No price data | 18% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 21% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | Not reported | Not reported | $43.2B | $6.4B |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |