The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
CZR · Consumer Discretionary · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
VOYG · Consumer Discretionary · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | HOG | CZR | VOYG | RRGB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 37 (highest) | 37 (highest) | 37 (highest) | 37 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 20 | 49 | 60 (highest) | 42 |
| Pricing power | 35 | — | 25 | 100 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 9 | 13 (highest) | — | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 79 (highest) | 9 | 28 | 17 |
| Capital allocation | 40 | 75 (highest) | 34 | 24 |
| 63% below value if growth stopped today | No price data | No price data | No price data | |
| Market cap | $2.8B | $6.1B | $1.0B | $130M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |