The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
TRWD · Consumer Staples · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | KDP | SMPL | TRWD | JJSF |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 57 (highest) | 57 (highest) | 57 (highest) | 56 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 65 | 94 (highest) | 32 | 74 |
| Pricing power | 89 | 65 | 96 (highest) | 46 |
| Returns on capital | 2 | 13 | — | 34 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 50 | 55 | 78 | 100 (highest) |
| Capital discipline | 77 (highest) | 60 | 24 | 24 |
| Price vs. high estimate | 66% above high estimate | 54% below high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) | No price data | 26% above high estimate |
| Market cap | $40.3B | $1.0B | Not reported | $1.5B |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |