The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
MA · Technology · Wide moat
On the watchlist
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | MA | JKHY | URI | TTD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 89 (highest) | 89 (highest) | 89 (highest) | 88 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 80 | 96 | 100 (highest) | 95 |
| Pricing power | — | 71 | 70 | 100 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) | 93 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 94 | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) | 73 |
| Capital discipline | 80 (highest) | 77 | 73 | 80 (highest) |
| Price vs. high estimate | No price data | 61% above high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) | 65% above high estimate | 123% above high estimate |
| Market cap | Not reported | $11.0B | $72.0B | $8.5B |
| Moat tier | Wide moat | Wide moat | Wide moat | Wide moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |