The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
MA · Technology · Wide moat
On the watchlist
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | MA | MPWR | URI | TTD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 89 | 90 (highest) | 89 | 88 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 80 | 95 | 100 (highest) | 95 |
| Pricing power | — | 93 | 70 | 100 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) | 93 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 94 | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) | 73 |
| Capital allocation | 80 (highest) | 60 | 73 | 80 (highest) |
| No price data | 1099% above value if growth stopped today | 138% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 191% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | Not reported | $58.3B | $64.0B | $6.9B |
| Moat tier | Wide moat | Wide moat | Wide moat | Wide moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |