The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
FGC · Other · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
GREEL · Other · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | MARA | FGC | GREEL | EMPD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 25 | 28 (highest) | 26 | 25 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 50 (highest) | 13 | 35 | 50 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 0 (highest) | — | — | 0 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 4 | 0 | 9 (highest) | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 28 | 55 (highest) | 15 | 28 |
| Capital allocation | 44 | 44 | 44 | 46 (highest) |
| No price data | No price data | No price data | No price data | |
| Market cap | $2.8B | $44.2M | $402M | $92.3M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |