The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
MATX · Industrials · Narrow moat
Wonderful & reasonably priced
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
DHI · Industrials · Narrow moat
Wonderful & reasonably priced
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | MATX | DHI | HBB | PNR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 67 (highest) | 67 (highest) | 67 (highest) | 67 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 32 | 56 | 58 | 70 (highest) |
| Pricing power | — | 33 | 34 | 58 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 40 | — | 100 (highest) | 79 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 95 | 78 | 99 (highest) | 78 |
| Capital allocation | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) | 42 | 49 |
| 21% above value if growth stopped today | 18% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | No price data | No price data | |
| Market cap | $6.4B | $43.2B | Not reported | Not reported |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |