The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

MMM · Healthcare · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

SPRO · Healthcare · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

PNTG · Healthcare · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

CSBR · Healthcare · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

MeasureMMMSPROPNTGCSBR
Moat Score (0–100)56 (highest)56 (highest)56 (highest)56 (highest)
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend2065100 (highest)40
Pricing power72——76 (highest)
Returns on capital97 (highest)142883
Balance-sheet safety45100 (highest)3555
Capital allocation454460 (highest)24
80% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today)No price data851% above value if growth stopped todayNo price data
Market cap$87.2B$63.2M$1.4B$66.8M
Moat tierShallow moatShallow moatShallow moatShallow moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2025FY2025FY2026