The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
GDDY · Technology · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | NTNX | MMS | GDDY | SHOP |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 60 (highest) | 60 (highest) | 60 (highest) | 60 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 85 (highest) | 71 | 56 | 78 |
| Pricing power | 91 (highest) | 38 | — | 84 |
| Returns on capital | 0 | 72 (highest) | 46 | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 100 (highest) | 39 | 39 | 100 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 24 | 81 | 100 (highest) | 38 |
| No price data | Around the value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 33% above value if growth stopped today | 2746% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | Not reported | $3.4B | $14.3B | $221.2B |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filing date | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |