The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

PNTG · Healthcare · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

COHR · Healthcare · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The balanceSheet component abstained: Insufficient leverage/coverage inputs to score the balance sheet. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

SPRO · Healthcare · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MMM · Healthcare · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

MeasurePNTGCOHRSPROMMM
Moat Score (0–100)56 (highest)56 (highest)56 (highest)56 (highest)
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend100 (highest)906520
Pricing power—58—72 (highest)
Returns on capital28151497 (highest)
Balance-sheet safety35—100 (highest)45
Capital allocation60 (highest)60 (highest)4445
875% above value if growth stopped today1649% above value if growth stopped todayNo price data81% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today)
Market cap$1.4B$45.6B$62.1M$87.3B
Moat tierShallow moatShallow moatShallow moatShallow moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2026FY2025FY2025