The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
PXED · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
On the watchlist
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | PXED | BLMN | TGT | EZPW |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 56 (highest) | 56 (highest) | 56 (highest) | 56 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 32 | 33 | 39 | 95 (highest) |
| Pricing power | — | 100 (highest) | 49 | 98 |
| Returns on capital | 100 (highest) | 55 | 86 | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 73 (highest) | 53 | 60 | 63 |
| Capital allocation | 20 | 40 | 46 (highest) | 24 |
| 32% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 23% below value if growth stopped today | 52% above value if growth stopped today | 328% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $849M | $872M | $69.9B | $2.4B |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 |