The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
R · Consumer Discretionary · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
KNIH · Consumer Discretionary · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The capitalDiscipline component abstained: Not enough owner-earnings history to score capital discipline. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | R | G | KNIH | MUSA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 74 | 75 (highest) | 75 (highest) | 74 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 80 | 87 (highest) | 85 | 66 |
| Pricing power | 100 (highest) | 60 | 96 | 100 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | — | 73 | 18 | 100 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 26 | 64 | 100 (highest) | 36 |
| Capital allocation | 92 (highest) | 88 | — | 68 |
| 85% above value if growth stopped today | 19% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | No price data | No price data | |
| Market cap | $10.7B | $7.0B | Not reported | Not reported |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |