The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

REYN · Materials · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

AR · Materials · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

FSI · Materials · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

EL · Materials · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

MeasureREYNARFSIEL
Moat Score (0–100)45 (highest)45 (highest)45 (highest)45 (highest)
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend50 (highest)404117
Pricing power35—4599 (highest)
Returns on capital—45062 (highest)
Balance-sheet safety329091 (highest)23
Capital allocation64 (highest)48024
37% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today)275% above value if growth stopped today142% above value if growth stopped today585% above value if growth stopped today
Market cap$4.8B$12.4B$81.6M$39.6B
Moat tierShallow moatShallow moatShallow moatShallow moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2025FY2025FY2026