The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
GDDY · Technology · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | SHOP | GDDY | NTNX | ZETA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 60 (highest) | 60 (highest) | 60 (highest) | 60 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 78 | 56 | 85 (highest) | 70 |
| Pricing power | 84 | — | 91 | 100 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 0 | 46 (highest) | 0 | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 100 (highest) | 39 | 100 (highest) | 86 |
| Capital allocation | 38 | 100 (highest) | 24 | 44 |
| 2891% above value if growth stopped today | 34% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | No price data | No price data | |
| Market cap | $232.5B | $14.5B | Not reported | $7.4B |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 |