The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
SLGN · Industrials · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The balanceSheet component abstained: Insufficient leverage/coverage inputs to score the balance sheet. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | SLGN | DINO | GLW | FWRD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 41 (highest) | 41 (highest) | 41 (highest) | 40 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 48 | 50 | 69 (highest) | 55 |
| Pricing power | 28 | 27 | 54 | 85 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 21 | 21 | 6 | 50 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | — | 47 (highest) | 41 | 0 |
| Capital allocation | 65 (highest) | 60 | 35 | 12 |
| Around the value if growth stopped today | 96% above value if growth stopped today | 675% above value if growth stopped today | 60% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | |
| Market cap | $4.0B | $22.6B | $113.3B | $471M |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |