The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
STZ · Consumer Staples · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The businessTrend component abstained: Fewer than two aligned fiscal years of revenue and diluted EPS are available; the filing history does not contain a measurable trend. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
MOJO · Consumer Staples · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The capitalDiscipline component abstained: Not enough owner-earnings history to score capital discipline. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | STZ | MOJO | CELH | BRCC |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 43 | 44 (highest) | 43 | 42 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | — | 75 | 85 (highest) | 63 |
| Pricing power | 85 (highest) | 68 | 67 | 56 |
| Returns on capital | 22 (highest) | 4 | 6 | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 23 | 29 | 35 (highest) | 28 |
| Capital discipline | 42 | — | 24 | 64 (highest) |
| Price vs. high estimate | No price data | No price data | 258% above high estimate | No price data |
| Market cap | Not reported | $7.5M | $7.0B | Not reported |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |