The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
TW · Other · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
WDLF · Other · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The capitalDiscipline component abstained: Not enough owner-earnings history to score capital discipline. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
VRTS · Other · Narrow moat
Wonderful & reasonably priced
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
CNS · Other · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | TW | WDLF | VRTS | CNS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 69 | 70 (highest) | 69 | 68 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 100 (highest) | 80 | 28 | 33 |
| Pricing power | — | 81 | — | — |
| Returns on capital | 23 | 18 | 89 | 100 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 73 | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 81 (highest) | — | 60 | 39 |
| 313% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | 63% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 104% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $24.4B | $3M | $823M | $3.6B |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2022 | FY2025 | FY2025 |