The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
MA · Technology · Wide moat
On the watchlist
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | URI | MPWR | JKHY | MA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 89 | 90 (highest) | 89 | 89 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 100 (highest) | 95 | 96 | 80 |
| Pricing power | 70 | 93 (highest) | 71 | — |
| Returns on capital | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) | 94 |
| Capital allocation | 73 | 60 | 77 | 80 (highest) |
| 167% above value if growth stopped today | 1213% above value if growth stopped today | 161% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | No price data | |
| Market cap | $72.0B | $63.9B | $11.0B | Not reported |
| Moat tier | Wide moat | Wide moat | Wide moat | Wide moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |