The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
WH · Consumer Discretionary · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
CRL · Consumer Discretionary · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
| Measure | WH | CVU | UAA | CRL |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 35 (highest) | 35 (highest) | 35 (highest) | 35 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 55 (highest) | 15 | 13 | 46 |
| Pricing power | — | 0 | 77 | 100 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 47 | 83 (highest) | 8 | 18 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 2 | 55 (highest) | 28 | 0 |
| Capital allocation | 37 | 24 | 50 (highest) | 12 |
| No price data | 29% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 1656% above value if growth stopped today | 135% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | Not reported | $62M | $3.0B | $11.2B |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 |