The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
GDDY · Technology · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | ZETA | GDDY | SHOP | DELL |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 60 (highest) | 60 (highest) | 60 (highest) | 60 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 70 | 56 | 78 (highest) | 67 |
| Pricing power | 100 (highest) | — | 84 | 35 |
| Returns on capital | 0 | 46 | 0 | 72 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 86 | 39 | 100 (highest) | 38 |
| Capital allocation | 44 | 100 (highest) | 38 | 87 |
| No price data | 17% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 1810% above value if growth stopped today | 407% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $4.2B | $12.6B | $148.4B | $285.1B |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 |