The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
MA · Technology · Wide moat
On the watchlist
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | ADSK | MA | TTD | UI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 88 | 89 (highest) | 88 | 88 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 100 (highest) | 80 | 95 | 70 |
| Pricing power | 100 (highest) | — | 100 (highest) | 70 |
| Returns on capital | 90 | 100 (highest) | 93 | 100 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 97 | 94 | 73 | 98 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 52 | 80 | 80 | 100 (highest) |
| 295% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | 261% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 602% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $44.5B | Not reported | $8.5B | $31.8B |
| Moat tier | Wide moat | Wide moat | Wide moat | Wide moat |
| Filing date | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |