The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
CTRN · Consumer Discretionary · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | AUC | HOG | RRGB | CTRN |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 37 (highest) | 37 (highest) | 37 (highest) | 36 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 33 | 20 | 42 (highest) | 21 |
| Pricing power | 70 | 35 | 100 (highest) | — |
| Returns on capital | 0 | 9 | 0 | 34 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 55 | 79 (highest) | 17 | 51 |
| Capital allocation | 24 | 40 (highest) | 24 | 40 (highest) |
| No price data | 63% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | No price data | 808% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $93.6M | $2.8B | $130M | $525M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2024 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 |