The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

FGNX · Other · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

AIFC · Other · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

MGTE · Other · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

GREEL · Other · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MeasureFGNXAIFCMGTEGREEL
Moat Score (0–100)2829 (highest)29 (highest)26
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend132050 (highest)35
Pricing power26
Returns on capital0009 (highest)
Balance-sheet safety55 (highest)55 (highest)4015
Capital allocation44 (highest)44 (highest)2444 (highest)
No price dataNo price dataNo price dataNo price data
Market cap$59.9M$72.5M$74.7M$390M
Moat tierNo moatNo moatNo moatNo moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2025FY2025FY2025