The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
SEG · Communications · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | GMBL | SEG | ECHO | SHEN |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 37 (highest) | 37 (highest) | 37 (highest) | 37 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 20 | 50 | 10 | 60 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 93 | — | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 0 | 0 | 4 (highest) | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 28 | 55 (highest) | 28 | 0 |
| Capital allocation | 44 (highest) | 44 (highest) | 44 (highest) | 24 |
| No price data | No price data | 756% above value if growth stopped today | 602% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | |
| Market cap | $340575 | $333M | $25.3B | $627M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2023 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |