The widest moats of 2013, scored with only what was filed then.

Scored using filings available on 2013-12-31 — no later restatements, no hindsight. 1,326 companies scored; the table lists the 100 widest by point-in-time moat composite. The forward returns below were joined afterward: entry is the first market close on or after Jan 1, 2014.

#Company
1HERBALIFE LTD.HLFfrom FY2012 10-KWide moat99.4−53%−38%49%
2MYRIAD GENETICS, INC.MYGNfrom FY2013 10-KWide moat99.059%−22%34%
3MANHATTAN ASSOCIATES, INC.MANHfrom FY2012 10-KWide moat98.935%86%44%
4Fossil Group, Inc.FOSLfrom FY2012 10-KWide moat98.8−7%−78%−86%
5ResMed Inc.RMDfrom FY2013 10-KWide moat98.326%43%166%
6NU SKIN ENTERPRISES, INC.NUSfrom FY2012 10-KWide moat98.3−69%−61%−49%
7Medifast, Inc.MEDfrom FY2012 10-KWide moat98.224%67%428%
8Oracle CorporationORCLfrom FY2013 10-KWide moat98.119%7%28%
9RALPH LAUREN CORPORATIONRLfrom FY2013 10-KWide moat97.06%−46%−34%
10Grand Canyon Education, Inc.LOPEfrom FY2012 10-KThe pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.Wide moat96.15%35%116%
11FACTSET RESEARCH SYSTEMS INC.FDSfrom FY2013 10-KThe pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.Wide moat96.031%58%95%
12C.H. ROBINSON WORLDWIDE, INC.CHRWfrom FY2012 10-KWide moat95.931%35%61%
13TRIPADVISOR, INC.TRIPfrom FY2012 10-KWide moat95.9−7%−41%−33%
14AMERICAN PUBLIC EDUCATION, INC.APEIfrom FY2012 10-KThe pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.Wide moat95.8−15%−42%−35%
15Tapestry, Inc.TPRfrom FY2013 10-KWide moat95.6−31%−29%−27%
16THE BOSTON BEER COMPANY, INC.SAMfrom FY2012 10-KWide moat95.526%−23%6%
17Cirrus Logic, Inc.CRUSfrom FY2013 10-KWide moat95.418%184%70%
18PAPA JOHN’S INTERNATIONAL, INC.PZZAfrom FY2012 10-KThe pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.Wide moat95.427%94%−6%
19Estee Lauder Companies IncELfrom FY2013 10-KWide moat95.44%9%91%
20MESA LABORATORIES, INC.MLABfrom FY2013 10-KThe capitalDiscipline component abstained: Not enough owner-earnings history to score capital discipline. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.Wide moat95.35%64%178%
21EXPONENT, INC.EXPOfrom FY2012 10-KThe pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.Wide moat95.18%63%179%
22TERADATA CORP /DE/TDCfrom FY2012 10-KWide moat95.0−2%−38%−16%
23Proto Labs, Inc.PRLBfrom FY2012 10-KThe returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.Wide moat95.0−3%−25%59%
24THE CHEESECAKE FACTORY INCORPORATEDCAKEfrom FY2012 10-KWide moat94.96%30%−2%
25Intuitive Surgical, Inc.ISRGfrom FY2012 10-KWide moat94.938%69%268%
26VERA BRADLEY, INC.VRAfrom FY2013 10-KWide moat94.5−17%−50%−63%
27NATURES SUNSHINE PRODUCTS INCNATRfrom FY2012 10-KThe capitalDiscipline component abstained: Not enough owner-earnings history to score capital discipline. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.Wide moat94.4−8%−2%−44%
28USANA HEALTH SCIENCES, INC.USNAfrom FY2012 10-KWide moat94.433%62%203%
29F5, INC.FFIVfrom FY2013 10-KWide moat94.447%63%81%
30ADVANCE AUTO PARTS, INC.AAPfrom FY2012 10-KWide moat94.445%56%45%
31DECKERS OUTDOOR CORPDECKfrom FY2012 10-KWide moat93.97%−31%54%
32lululemon athletica inc.LULUfrom FY2013 10-KWide moat93.9−6%14%111%
33ZIFF DAVIS, INC.ZDfrom FY2012 10-KWide moat93.826%76%53%
34Monster Beverage CorpMNSTfrom FY2012 10-KWide moat93.662%105%119%
35IDEXX LABORATORIES INC /DEIDXXfrom FY2012 10-KWide moat93.540%124%247%
36COGNIZANT TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS CORPORATIONCTSHfrom FY2012 10-KThe pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.Wide moat93.37%14%30%
37NRC HealthNRCfrom FY2012 10-KThe pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.Wide moat92.9−25%9%131%
38TANDY LEATHER FACTORY, INCTLFfrom FY2012 10-KWide moat92.9−7%−16%−37%
39UNDER ARMOUR, INC.UAAfrom FY2012 10-KWide moat92.854%37%−18%
40WHERE FOOD COMES FROM, INC.WFCFfrom FY2012 10-KWide moat92.843%2%2%
41Gartner, Inc.ITfrom FY2012 10-KWide moat92.720%43%80%
42INTUIT INC.INTUfrom FY2013 10-KWide moat92.421%56%170%
43Cboe Global Markets, Inc.CBOEfrom FY2012 10-KThe pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.Wide moat92.326%50%101%
44UNITED-GUARDIAN, INC.UGfrom FY2012 10-KWide moat92.1−28%−37%−15%
45GLOBUS MEDICAL, INC.GMEDfrom FY2012 10-KWide moat92.020%26%101%
46J.B. HUNT TRANSPORT SERVICES, INC.JBHTfrom FY2012 10-KThe pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.Wide moat91.810%30%28%
47AMBARELLA, INC.AMBAfrom FY2013 10-KThe returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.Wide moat91.854%59%9%
48Omega Flex, Inc.OFLXfrom FY2012 10-KThe balanceSheet component abstained: No debt, cash, or interest-expense disclosures to score the balance sheet. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.Wide moat91.777%177%190%
49FRANKLIN RESOURCES, INC.BENfrom FY2013 10-KThe pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.Wide moat91.4−0%−25%−37%
50MICROSOFT CORPORATIONMSFTfrom FY2013 10-KWide moat91.429%83%207%
51INTEL CORPINTCfrom FY2012 10-KWide moat91.345%56%111%
52CLEARONE INCCLROfrom FY2012 10-KWide moat91.29%28%−85%
53COMMVAULT SYSTEMS INCCVLTfrom FY2013 10-KThe returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.Wide moat91.1−30%−29%−22%
54BIOGEN INC.BIIBfrom FY2012 10-KWide moat90.922%4%9%
55Texas Roadhouse, Inc.TXRHfrom FY2012 10-KThe pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.Wide moat90.825%84%134%
56WINMARK CORPORATIONWINAfrom FY2012 10-KThe capitalDiscipline component abstained: Not enough owner-earnings history to score capital discipline. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.Wide moat90.61%48%89%
57FASTENAL COFASTfrom FY2012 10-KWide moat90.44%9%23%
58COHEN & STEERS, INC.CNSfrom FY2012 10-KThe pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.Wide moat89.911%−2%16%
59STRYKER CORPSYKfrom FY2012 10-KWide moat89.828%67%121%
60JACK HENRY & ASSOCIATES, INC.JKHYfrom FY2013 10-KWide moat89.79%60%127%
61LANDSTAR SYSTEM, INC.LSTRfrom FY2012 10-KThe pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.Wide moat89.727%55%79%
62BUCKLE, INCBKEfrom FY2013 10-KWide moat89.38%−45%−45%
63COLGATE-PALMOLIVE COMPANYCLfrom FY2012 10-KWide moat89.110%9%3%
64McDONALD’S CORPORATIONMCDfrom FY2012 10-KThe pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.Wide moat89.10%37%110%
65NORDSON CORPORATIONNDSNfrom FY2013 10-KWide moat88.98%60%68%
66AUTOZONE INCAZOfrom FY2013 10-KWide moat88.930%67%77%
67MSC INDUSTRIAL DIRECT CO., INC.MSMfrom FY2013 10-KWide moat88.96%27%9%
68OneSpan Inc.OSPNfrom FY2012 10-KWide moat88.9260%85%70%
69SLEEP NUMBER CORPORATIONSNBRQfrom FY2012 10-KWide moat88.8
70INTERPARFUMS, INC.IPARfrom FY2012 10-KWide moat88.7−20%1%107%
71DOLLAR TREE, INC.DLTRfrom FY2013 10-KWide moat88.425%37%62%
72eBay Inc.EBAYfrom FY2012 10-KWide moat88.44%31%27%
73Capri Holdings LtdCPRIfrom FY2013 10-KWide moat87.8−9%−48%−53%
74TYLER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.TYLfrom FY2012 10-KWide moat87.76%43%80%
75LIQUIDITY SERVICES, INCLQDTfrom FY2013 10-KThe pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.Wide moat87.5−65%−56%−71%
76CUMBERLAND PHARMACEUTICALS INCCPIXfrom FY2012 10-KWide moat87.419%14%25%
77WILLIAMS-SONOMA, INC.WSMfrom FY2013 10-KWide moat87.230%−10%−3%
78CVR ENERGY, INCCVIfrom FY2012 10-KThe pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.Wide moat87.24%−20%38%
79QUALCOMM INC/DEQCOMfrom FY2013 10-KWide moat87.03%−3%−9%
80Accenture plcACNfrom FY2013 10-KThe returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.Wide moat86.812%55%94%
81MARATHON PETROLEUM CORPORATIONMPCfrom FY2012 10-KThe pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.Wide moat86.75%28%52%
82Apple Inc.AAPLfrom FY2013 10-KWide moat86.641%56%119%
83Booking Holdings Inc.BKNGfrom FY2012 10-KWide moat86.6−0%29%50%
84EPAM SYSTEMS, INC.EPAMfrom FY2012 10-KThe businessTrend component abstained: Fewer than two aligned fiscal years of revenue and diluted EPS are available; the filing history does not contain a measurable trend. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.Wide moat86.634%83%229%
85Carter's, Inc.CRIfrom FY2012 10-KWide moat86.420%24%20%
86Neogen CorporationNEOGfrom FY2013 10-KWide moat86.210%49%72%
87Moody’s CorporationMCOfrom FY2012 10-KThe pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.Wide moat86.126%29%94%
88Waters CorporationWATfrom FY2012 10-KWide moat85.915%38%85%
89PRICE T ROWE GROUP INCTROWfrom FY2012 10-KWide moat85.86%2%30%
90AMERICAN EAGLE OUTFITTERS INCAEOfrom FY2013 10-KWide moat85.7−3%16%54%
91Maximus, Inc.MMSfrom FY2013 10-KWide moat85.726%31%55%
92DONALDSON COMPANY, INC.DCIfrom FY2013 10-KWide moat85.6−9%4%9%
93Urban Outfitters, Inc.URBNfrom FY2013 10-KWide moat85.6−7%−24%−12%
94O Reilly Automotive IncORLYfrom FY2012 10-KWide moat85.549%118%165%
95Jazz Pharmaceuticals plcJAZZfrom FY2012 10-KThe pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.Wide moat85.429%−12%−1%
96WD-40 COMPANYWDFCfrom FY2013 10-KWide moat85.216%66%161%
97ARK RESTAURANTS CORP.ARKRfrom FY2013 10-KThe pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.Wide moat85.23%26%3%
98GEOSPACE TECHNOLOGIES CORPGEOSfrom FY2013 10-KWide moat85.2−72%−77%−88%
99GENTEX CORPORATIONGNTXfrom FY2012 10-KWide moat85.113%33%38%
100NETSCOUT SYSTEMS, INC.NTCTfrom FY2013 10-KWide moat85.126%11%−18%
Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.B, total return)benchmark · total return (same basis)27%39%73%
S&P 500 (price return)benchmark · price return12%23%37%

Two benchmarks, and we’re careful about the basis. Company returns are total returns (dividends reinvested). Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.B, total return) is on the same total-return basis — the fair, like-for-like comparison (Berkshire pays no dividend, so its dividend-adjusted and price series coincide). The S&P 500 (price return) is a price index that excludes dividends and so understates the market by roughly its dividend yield — shown for reference, not as a fair bar. A “—” is an unfinished forward window or a name without joined returns, never a zero. Where a name stopped trading mid-window it reports null with a note, never a guessed return.

The caveats, in the engine’s own words

  • Point-in-time reconstruction: each score uses only SEC filings on file by Dec 31 of the cohort year; restatements filed later are ignored, and filers with December fiscal year-ends are scored off the prior fiscal year (their 10-K arrives the following spring).
  • Survivorship bias: unless delisted companies were ingested explicitly by CIK, the cohort is drawn from companies still filing with the SEC today — names that failed or delisted since are missing, which flatters any forward-looking comparison. Companies whose filings had already gone stale at the cutoff are computed but excluded from the ranking (the stale count). The same caveat extends to returns: a name that stopped trading mid-window reports null with a note, never a guessed return through its delisting. Price histories are keyed by each company's ticker symbol as of today; a symbol that changed hands between issuers during a window can misattribute price history.
  • Scores are business-quality only: no prices feed them, so the price-vs.-estimate comparison and price-dependent verdicts are absent. Forward returns are a separate join of market data made after scoring and never influence any score.
  • Forward returns start strictly after the information cutoff: entry is the first trading close on or after Jan 1 of the year following the cohort year, and each 1y/3y/5y window runs anchor-to-anchor to the first trading close of the corresponding later year. Windows that have not fully elapsed are null — never annualized or extrapolated from a partial period.
  • Return basis honesty: company returns are total returns (split-adjusted closes with dividends reinvested at the ex-date); the S&P 500 benchmark is the ^GSPC price index, which excludes dividends and therefore understates the index by roughly its dividend yield in any comparison. A second benchmark, Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.B), is computed on the SAME total-return basis as the companies — Berkshire pays no dividend, so its dividend-adjusted series equals its price series, and the same code path is used so the comparison is strictly like-for-like. Each record labels its own returnBasis.
  • Educational, not investment advice. Hindsight makes every backtest look wiser than anyone could have been at the time.